Community

Already a member?
Login
Login using Facebook:
Last visitors
Powered by Sociable!

join me on facebook!

terms of use

Creative Commons License
Life as Edward Jensen and The News from Downtown Phoenix by Edward Jensen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
28th February 2009

On why Constructive Arguments win.

I’m afraid that the US Republican Party is losing its standing as a loyal opposition party to the Democrats. Their response to both the recently-passed stimulus package and also to President Obama’s budget plan has been loud cries of “no!” and “it’s Socialist!”. But being at an institution of higher learning, we know that simply saying “no!” in response to an argument would not make the grade.

After the 2008 Republican National convention, I wrote up a quick entry touching on this same topic.  I said this:

What are your stances on policy issues, Republicans? I know I can go to your various campaign websites and see for myself, but I want a principled argument from your side why I should vote for you. To say that Obama is inexperienced – even if he might be – is not the basis for an academic argument.

So, let’s get back to the basics: if you, Republicans, are against President Obama’s budget and other policies, simply saying “no!” is not an appropriate response.  Let’s hear what your ideas are.  Political parties that are in loyal opposition to other parties would work best, I believe, if they offered constructive arguments and constructive dialogue to other groups.  Anything else, I believe, just doesn’t make the grade.

Cheers-
Edward Jensen

  • Share/Bookmark

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments are posted by readers in the community, and are not necessarily the opinions of Edward Jensen, the author of this blog. With this said, you are more than welcome to disagree with me! As a colleague of mine said once, "Discourse, dissent, and disagreement are the cornerstones of democracy", so I welcome differing viewpoints. Any arguments, however, must be backed up by verifiable evidence (e.g. citations). Personal attacks, spam, and arguments made without verifiable claims will not be approved and posted.